Michael Paige, a columnist for CBS MarketWatch, recently wrote… “Palm Faces Slick Competition and Pricing Pressure”
I can not really argue the analyst comments. The comments represent known concerns, and the current negativity surrounding PALM merit a high degree of those concerns until PALM’s management proves them wrong. Paige is overall fair, but some points i thought were off the mark…
1. “Palm’s latest Treo designs look basically the same as the devices it rolled out nearly three years ago. In the meantime, rivals like RIM and Motorola have managed to win fans with products that have sleek new designs — and are priced aggressively.”
-True about pricing, but the Treo’s 700 design is such a nice design, and it fits so well in for the high speed networks. I can not argue w/the Q’s ability to sell (it is consistently in the top 3 of amazon.com best selling PDAs… but all the Treos are consistently in the top 10) I am not a fan of the Q design. It is thin, but ugly. RIM has not brought any revolutionary design to the market. The Pearl is a ‘ho-hum’ looking phone simply varying from what RIM is known to produce. I still think the Treo design wins here.
2. “RIM, of Waterloo, Ontario, has scored rave reviews and potential converts among Palm users with its newest device, called Pearl. [siting Bambi’s article]”
-Uhm, that is one jouranlist who gave a very fluff piece as to why the Pearl is good. Basically Bambi’s article stated the navigation system is hands down the best (not siting specifics) and that the SureType was really good. Siting her friends use of the typing, but i have a much different experience when using SureType. (read her editorial so you can decide) I recommend searching the Pearl and see what the blogs are saying about the Pearl. Here is CNET’s review… “wasn’t exactly a hidden gem” (http://reviews.cnet.com/RIM_BlackBerry_Pearl/4505-6452_7-32041928-2.html?tag=sub) sorry, i’m having a problem linking.