Archive for April, 2007

Morning Moves

Monday, April 30th, 2007

Sold BRCM, for about a 3% loss, to purchase ICE.  The ISE bid was too overwhelming for me.  If ISE could go for such a premium, then ICE can go for more. (ICE is in a better area of focus and generally executing very well.)

I did not want to play the options here because on a technical level ICE was breaking down to 120, and the premium created by the volatility was too rich for me. So I bought shares.

I would of held on to BRCM, but again due to the tight restrictions on DNDN I do not want to be leveraged with the threat of lossing any of my DNDN shares. 

ISE… wow

Monday, April 30th, 2007

If the ISE bid does not speak for how undervalued ICE currently is, then I do not know what does.

If you got the cash, look to play ICE. (Even at 130.)

Fuel Tech Inc

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

Listening to ‘Bulls & Bears’ this morning, the guy from S&P (I think Pat?) talked about FTEK. Got interested when he said it, so I looked into it… and it looks interesting.

When I looked into the name, I found it to be a very interesting company and concept. I kept thinking about the ‘Green’ push from California, and how this company will benefit.

I wanted to relay a few things from what I found interesting regarding FTEK (the stock).

There was a SeekingAlpha.com interview where the CEO, John Norris, stated:

“Personally I think this is a great buying opportunity (and I just recently did so in my personal accounts). If you believe that we can and will execute our business plan and grow this company rapidly and profitably, then today’s stock price is not over-valued at all. If you don’t believe that we can and will execute and achieve the results, then the stock price is already too high. It all depends on what you believe about the Fuel Tech team.”

So the CEO is basically saying (in a round about way) he thinks the company will continue to grow rapidly and profitably. That is a good thing, but if it does not, the stock will hick up in a big way. FTEK needs to grow earnings by some 40-45% to justify its current stock price, and even more for any upside. (But the CEO said they can do it.) OR, since it is a momentum play of sorts, FTEK needs to beat Revenue growth of 27%. (This is the high end of managment’s estimated Rev. growth.)

On the TA front, FTEK looks a bit over extended, and the 50SMA may act as resistance. So a buying opportunity may present itself later.

My Deal with Myself

Friday, April 27th, 2007

While writing a comment on my recent NYX submission to SeekingAlpha.com I made a deal with myself… If DNDN goes to 50 or NYX doubles by year end I will post my life story on the blog and even post pictures of me celebrating. :)

Inflation Threat?

Friday, April 27th, 2007

I just had some time to go over the PCE numbers from today’s BEA report. (info) I investigated the numbers further because I did not like the headlines that suggested inflation worries due to the core PCE deflator.

So, when you look at the actual numbers and the breakdown of the growth, the increased growth is clearly coming from a few key areas.

1. Motors

2. Fuel Oil and Coal

3. Electricity and Gas

4. Medical Care

5. ‘Other’ w/in Services (do not really know what it means, but it is too high for my taste)

I am not going to pretend to know how to read this stuff, nor am I aware of economist expectations for these numbers.  But what I do see is a lower rate from the previous quarter, and a high rate due to general fuel and energy.

i just do not see the threat, but since the media is harping on it, look for some protection before the CPI and PPI numbers come out.

Thoughts on the Economy and the Markets

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

I have been thinking about the economy and general health of the markets since the recent PPI and CPI numbers. The numbers came in as expected, even when gasoline has been averaging the low/mid 2s. Then the news that China will have to increase rates as they can not control their growth. Even Germany and other European countries are picking up.

If the ROW (rest of world) was not growing, and growing nicely, I think the US economy would be in a real deflationary threat.

With inflation subsided and global economic growth still present, the US equity market looks cheap. I try to keep thinking about this when I have the itch to short the market after our recent run. The market may very well keep rising until there is a fundamental shift in economic sentament. This is another reason why I think Oil is still a good play here. Because of this inflation (or underlining deflation) situation we have, oil prices can go much higher before it really starts acting like a tax onto the economy.

Do not get me wrong, high gasoline prices is obviously having an affect on retail and will continue to affect the individual. But, if incomes keeps rising, the economy can tolerate it.

If inflation begins to rear its head, and gas prices being where they are, the US markets have a big problem on its hands…. and will look not so undervalued. As of now, investors should be in a wait and see mode, or at least closely follow the inflation indicators.

BRCM creates Uncertainty

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Why would Management say “mixed outlook from our larger customers… but remain optimistic for the 2nd half of the year”?

I mean, the semis have been dogs, and the only reason they are rallying is because they are not performing ‘as bad’ as many thought. So why did BRCM prepare the street for what they already know? And if they are optimistic for the 2nd half, why stay the negative comment in the first place.

The trade was right. BRCM beat rev. and earnings, yet those few comments caused the stock to decline. But was not expecting this management to create the level of uncertainty that they did.

As of now, I am holding. If it breaks 31, I will probably cut it loose.

UPDATE: Just went through the CC again…Based on the Q&A section, I think Management is being too conservative, way too conservative for the 2nd Q. Talk about a sandbagging.

Two Names I will Never Forget

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Maha Hussain and Howard Scher.  Both are doctors.  As a doctor you take the Hippocrates Oath to ensure you are an ethical doctor.  Within the oath it states,

“In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional ill-doing and all seduction…”

‘In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patient’.  The house in this case is the FDA, and the doctors are those mentioned above. (I will not even get into the second part of the quote as serious allegations can be made.)

By delaying a treatment that has NO safety risk, and substancial evidence of efficacy I ask this to the two doctors, “How the hell are you entering the house for the good of your patients?!?”

Again, Provenge does not prevent the use of chemo.  The treatment can be used with Chemo to potentially maximize patient ability to fight PC.  So I ask the doctors, “Do you remember the oath you took?”

Morning Moves

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Sold PMTI.  Looks like it can still move as it is still oversold, but there is some resistance around high 43. (chart) Thanks billwag… i owe you a drink… i think i owe you a few drinks :) 

Bought BRCM for the earnings play later today.  I would hold PMTI if I had the means to do it, but I need to keep myself flexible due to DNDN. PMTI probably started a bullish uptrend today. Could very well see 50-52 within 2-3 weeks. 

Also, look to play the oils. My favs are SLB and PGH.  Will probably get into May SLB calls today.

NYX and Regulation NMS

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Hmmm… interesting note in the NYX report:

“During the first quarter of 2007, NYSE Group completed the full implementation of the NYSE Hybrid Market(SM) and became fully Regulation NMS compliant.”

Sort of throws Goldman’s arguement out the window. Uhmmm… w/that, BUY NYX.